Hydrocortisone Acetate
| Evidence Level: L2 | Predicted Indications: 9 |
Table of Contents
Hydrocortisone Acetate: Alopecia areata
One-Sentence Summary
Hydrocortisone acetate is a low-potency corticosteroid with anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive activity. The TxGNN model predicts it may be effective for alopecia areata, with 1 clinical trial and 2 publications in the data compiled for this report. The evidence level is L2, and the trial used hydrocortisone only as a comparator.
Quick Overview
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Original Indication | Not recorded in the local data |
| Predicted New Indication | Alopecia areata |
| TxGNN Prediction Score | 0.9994 |
| Evidence Level | L2 |
| Australia Market Status | Listed on the PBS Schedule (1 of 1 items) – TGA (ARTG) registration status is not included in this data |
| Number of PBS Items | 1 (valid: 1) |
| Recommended Decision | Hold |
Why is This Prediction Reasonable?
Detailed mechanism of action data is not available in the data compiled for this report. Hydrocortisone is a glucocorticoid, and glucocorticoids are generally anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive.
Alopecia areata is a T-cell-mediated autoimmune disease affecting the hair follicle. Corticosteroids are an established treatment class for it, so the mechanistic link is plausible.
Hydrocortisone is a low-potency corticosteroid. Higher-potency agents (for example clobetasol or intralesional triamcinolone) are generally preferred, which limits the expected efficacy of hydrocortisone itself.
Clinical Trial Evidence
| Trial Number | Phase | Status | Enrolment | Key Findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCT01453686 | Phase 3 | Completed | 41 | Randomised controlled trial in children with alopecia areata comparing clobetasol propionate 0.05% cream with hydrocortisone 1% cream. Hydrocortisone was the low-potency comparator, not the investigational arm. The sample is small, and the formulation was hydrocortisone 1%, not hydrocortisone acetate specifically. |
Literature Evidence
| PMID | Year | Type | Journal | Key Findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4755919 | 1973 | Case series / clinical report | Przeglad dermatologiczny | Intralesional subcutaneous injections of hydrocortisone acetate suspension for severe alopecia areata (non-English; no abstract available). |
| 153470 | 1979 | Review | MMW, Munchener medizinische Wochenschrift | Review of topical skin therapy (non-English). It notes that the anti-inflammatory effect of fluocortin butyl ester is about equal to that of hydrocortisone acetate. It is not specific to alopecia areata. |
Australia Market Information
| ARTG Number | Product Name | Dosage Form | Approved Indication |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARTG 10831C | Cortic-DS 1% | Ointment containing hydrocortisone acetate 10 mg per g, 30 g | Not stated in the data compiled |
Safety Considerations
- Conditions recorded as contraindicated or to be avoided in related drug data: hypertension, epilepsy, gastric ulcer, kidney disease, liver disease, gallbladder disease, hyperglycaemia, measles, herpes simplex virus keratitis, and pituitary hormone deficiency or hypogonadotropic hypogonadism conditions. These are not drawn from label text.
For full warnings, contraindications and interaction information, please refer to the TGA-approved Product Information (PI).
Conclusion and Next Steps
Decision: Hold
Rationale: The only trial of alopecia areata used hydrocortisone 1% cream as the low-potency comparator, and the one other directly relevant publication is a 1973 case series without an abstract. The small, comparator-only evidence does not show that hydrocortisone acetate is effective. Higher-potency corticosteroids are generally preferred.
To proceed, the following is needed:
- Review of the full NCT01453686 results to see how the hydrocortisone arm performed
- Comparative data against higher-potency corticosteroids in alopecia areata
- Mechanism of action data
- Warnings and contraindications from the TGA-approved Product Information
Disclaimer
This content is for research purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical validation is required before any clinical application.