Dapsone

證據等級: L5 預測適應症: 10

目錄

  1. Dapsone
  2. Dapsone: From Leprosy to Pneumocystosis (PCP)
    1. One-Sentence Summary
    2. Quick Overview
    3. Why is This Prediction Reasonable?
    4. Clinical Trial Evidence
    5. Literature Evidence
    6. Australia Market Information
    7. Safety Considerations
    8. Conclusion and Next Steps
    9. Disclaimer

## 藥師評估報告

Dapsone: From Leprosy to Pneumocystosis (PCP)

One-Sentence Summary

Dapsone is a sulfone antibacterial classically used to treat leprosy (Hansen’s disease), as referenced within this evidence pack’s own literature (PMID 11155588, 19824739). The TxGNN model predicts it may be effective for Pneumocystosis (Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia, PCP), with 14 clinical trials and 19 publications currently supporting this direction — notably, dapsone is already an established second-line PCP prophylaxis/treatment agent in clinical practice for patients intolerant of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX).


Quick Overview

Item Content
Original Indication Leprosy (per literature evidence, PMID 11155588/19824739/20966036); not present in the ARTG licence data in this pack
Predicted New Indication Pneumocystosis (PCP)
TxGNN Prediction Score 99.73%
Evidence Level L1
Australia Market Status Not Marketed
Number of ARTG Entries 0
Recommended Decision Proceed with Guardrails

Why is This Prediction Reasonable?

Detailed formal mechanism-of-action data (DrugBank MOA field) is currently a data gap. Based on the repurposing rationale captured in this evidence pack, dapsone is a sulfone-class antibacterial that inhibits dihydropteroate synthase (DHPS), blocking folic acid synthesis in Pneumocystis jirovecii — the same mechanistic pathway targeted by sulfonamide antimicrobials.

This mechanistic link is not merely theoretical: dapsone (alone or combined with trimethoprim/pyrimethamine) is already recognised clinical practice as a standard second-line option for PCP prophylaxis and treatment in patients who cannot tolerate TMP-SMX. Multiple completed Phase 3 RCTs (e.g. NCT00000802, NCT00000640, NCT00000991) directly compared dapsone-based regimens against TMP-SMX, aerosolized pentamidine, and atovaquone in this setting, which strongly reinforces the plausibility of the TxGNN prediction.

The principal safety concern carried over from dapsone’s known pharmacology is haemolysis and methemoglobinemia in patients with G6PD deficiency, which is why pre-treatment G6PD screening is clinically important whenever dapsone is used for PCP prophylaxis or treatment.


Clinical Trial Evidence

Trial Number Phase Status Enrolment Key Findings
NCT00000802 Phase 3 Completed 700 Dapsone vs atovaquone for PCP prophylaxis in HIV patients intolerant of TMP/sulfonamides
NCT00000640 Phase 3 Completed 290 Dapsone/trimethoprim vs clindamycin/primaquine vs TMP-SMX for mild-to-moderate PCP treatment in AIDS
NCT00000991 Phase 3 Completed 600 Comparison of three anti-Pneumocystis regimens plus zidovudine for primary prevention of serious infection in advanced HIV
NCT00002283 N/A Completed N/A Dapsone plus trimethoprim vs TMP-SMX for first-episode PCP in AIDS patients
NCT00001028 Phase 3 Completed 400 Aerosolized pentamidine vs thrice-weekly dapsone for PCP prophylaxis in TMP/sulfonamide-intolerant patients
NCT00000739 Phase 1 Completed 96 Two oral dapsone dosing regimens for PCP prophylaxis in paediatric HIV infection
NCT02550080 Phase 4 Unknown 3130 HLA-B*1301 prospective genetic screening for dapsone hypersensitivity syndrome risk, including PCP patients
NCT00002120 Phase 1 Completed 20 Trimetrexate + dapsone + leucovorin vs TMP-SMX for moderately severe PCP
NCT04328688 N/A Completed 30 Clindamycin-TMP/SMX for PCP after solid organ transplant; notes dapsone as a second-line alternative when TMP-SMX fails
NCT05077150 N/A Completed 168 Case-control study of PCP risk factors after allogeneic HSCT; notes elevated PCP incidence (up to 7.2%) on low-dose dapsone prophylaxis

No Australian/New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) entries were identified for this evidence pack.


Literature Evidence

PMID Year Type Journal Key Findings
27550992 2016 Guideline J Antimicrob Chemother ECIL-5 guidelines for PCP prophylaxis in haematological malignancy/HSCT recipients
38583518 2024 Systematic Review / Network Meta-analysis Clin Microbiol Infect Comparative efficacy/safety of PCP prophylaxis regimens in people living with HIV, including dapsone-based regimens
39732393 2025 Systematic Review / Network Meta-analysis Clin Microbiol Infect Comparative efficacy/safety of PCP treatment regimens in people living with HIV
33870843 2021 Review Expert Opin Pharmacother Pneumocystis jirovecii review focused on prevention and treatment options
9675476 1998 Review Clin Infect Dis Use of dapsone in prevention and treatment of PCP; covers DHPS mechanism and pharmacokinetics
18971152 2008 Review J Formos Med Assoc General review of Pneumocystis pneumonia
7979291 1994 PK/Safety Study Antimicrob Agents Chemother Pharmacokinetics and safety of weekly dapsone (± pyrimethamine) for PCP prevention
8605054 1995 Clinical Study AIDS Aerosolized pentamidine, cotrimoxazole, and dapsone-pyrimethamine for primary PCP/toxoplasmic encephalitis prophylaxis
10073326 1999 PK Study J Clin Pharmacol Pharmacokinetics of trimetrexate and dapsone in AIDS patients with PCP
9606476 1998 Case Report Ann Pharmacother Dapsone-induced methemoglobinemia during PCP prophylaxis

Australia Market Information

No ARTG entries were found for dapsone in this evidence pack (total_licenses: 0, market_status: 未上市 / Not Marketed). Dapsone does not currently appear to hold an Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods listing under the data reviewed.


Safety Considerations

Formal TGA-sourced key warnings, contraindications, and drug–drug interaction data are marked as data gaps in this evidence pack (blocking gap DG001).

Evidence-derived signals worth noting from the literature and repurposing rationale (not formal PI data):

  • Haemolysis / methemoglobinemia: Case-level and mechanistic evidence (PMID 9606476) associates dapsone with methemoglobinemia; the repurposing rationale specifically flags G6PD deficiency as a key risk factor requiring pre-treatment screening.
  • Dapsone hypersensitivity syndrome: A dedicated Phase 4 trial (NCT02550080) is evaluating HLA-B*1301 screening to reduce this risk across dapsone indications, including PCP.

Please refer to the TGA-approved Product Information (PI) for authoritative safety information before clinical use.


Conclusion and Next Steps

Decision: Proceed with Guardrails

Rationale: Evidence Level L1 is supported by four or more completed Phase 3 RCTs directly evaluating dapsone-based regimens against standard-of-care comparators for PCP prophylaxis and treatment, and this use is already established second-line clinical practice — well beyond a purely model-driven prediction. However, dapsone has no current ARTG listing in Australia and formal TGA safety/labelling data are absent, so guardrails are required before clinical application.

To proceed, the following is needed:

  • TGA-approved Product Information (PI) — warnings, contraindications, and DDI data (blocking gap DG001)
  • Formal DrugBank/regulatory mechanism-of-action documentation (gap DG002)
  • Confirmation of Australian market/import pathway, since dapsone currently has 0 ARTG entries
  • A G6PD deficiency screening protocol prior to dapsone initiation for PCP indications

    Disclaimer

This content is for research purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical validation is required before any clinical application.



Copyright © 2026 藥提醒科技有限公司 (yao.care). This report is for research purposes only and does not constitute medical advice.

This site uses Just the Docs, a documentation theme for Jekyll.