Gilteritinib
| Evidence Level: L5 | Predicted Indications: 1 |
Table of Contents
- Gilteritinib
- Pharmacist Assessment Report
- Gilteritinib: From Acute Myeloid Leukaemia to Bulbar Polio
- One-Sentence Summary
- Quick Overview
- Why is This Prediction Reasonable?
- Clinical Trial Evidence
- Literature Evidence
- Australia Market Information
- Cytotoxicity
- Safety Considerations
- Conclusion and Next Steps
- Disclaimer
Gilteritinib: From Acute Myeloid Leukaemia to Bulbar Polio
One-Sentence Summary
Gilteritinib is an oral kinase inhibitor originally used to treat FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). The TxGNN model (deep learning) predicts it may be effective for bulbar polio, but this is a model prediction only, with 0 clinical trials and 0 publications supporting it.
Quick Overview
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Original Indication | Acute myeloid leukaemia (relapsed/refractory FLT3-mutated AML) |
| Predicted New Indication | Bulbar polio |
| TxGNN Prediction Score | 0.9910 |
| Evidence Level | L5 |
| Australia Market Status | Listed on the PBS Schedule (1 of 1 items) – TGA (ARTG) registration status is not included in this data |
| Number of PBS Items | 1 (valid: 1) |
| Recommended Decision | Hold |
Why is This Prediction Reasonable?
Gilteritinib is a FLT3/AXL tyrosine kinase inhibitor. It is used in AML driven by FLT3 mutations. Detailed mechanism of action data was not available in the data compiled for this report, so this description relies on the drug’s known class.
No mechanistic link was identified between this mechanism and bulbar polio. Bulbar polio is a viral infection of motor neurons. Gilteritinib targets signalling pathways that drive leukaemic cell growth, and nothing in the data connects those pathways to poliovirus infection or motor neuron injury.
The high score (0.9910) comes from the TxGNN model (deep learning) and may reflect similarities the model learned between related diseases, not biological evidence. It should not be read as evidence of efficacy.
Clinical Trial Evidence
Currently no related clinical trials registered.
Literature Evidence
Currently no related literature available.
Australia Market Information
| ARTG Number | Product Name | Dosage Form | Approved Indication |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARTG 13093D | Xospata | Tablet 40 mg (as fumarate) | Not stated in the data compiled for this report |
The product is an oral, single-ingredient tablet and its registration status is valid.
Cytotoxicity
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Cytotoxicity Classification | Targeted therapy (FLT3/AXL tyrosine kinase inhibitor) |
| Myelosuppression Risk | Please refer to the Product Information (PI) warnings and precautions |
| Emetogenicity Classification | Please refer to the Product Information (PI) warnings and precautions |
| Monitoring Items | Please refer to the Product Information (PI) warnings and precautions |
| Handling Protection | Please refer to the Product Information (PI) warnings and precautions |
Safety Considerations
- Drug Interactions: The interaction screen returned 100 interacting drugs, and 20 are shown in the data compiled for this report. Most are of moderate severity.
- Major: clarithromycin and dolasetron.
- Moderate (examples): aprepitant, cimetidine, famotidine, dexamethasone, levofloxacin, metformin, loperamide, palonosetron, naltrexone, miconazole, bisacodyl and linagliptin.
- Minor: metronidazole.
Please refer to the TGA-approved Product Information (PI) for warnings, contraindications and the full interaction list.
Conclusion and Next Steps
Decision: Hold
Rationale: The prediction rests only on a TxGNN model (deep learning) score, with no mechanistic link, trials or literature. Bulbar polio is a viral neurological disease with no biological connection to FLT3/AXL inhibition.
To proceed, the following is needed:
- A plausible mechanistic hypothesis linking FLT3/AXL inhibition to poliovirus infection or motor neuron pathology
- Preclinical evidence (for example, in vitro antiviral or neuroprotection data)
- Detailed mechanism of action data and the TGA-approved Product Information, including warnings and contraindications
- A review of whether a better-supported prediction should be assessed instead
Disclaimer
This content is for research purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical validation is required before any clinical application.