Mefenamic Acid

Evidence Level: L2 Predicted Indications: 6

Table of Contents

  1. Mefenamic Acid
    1. Pharmacist Assessment Report
    2. Mefenamic Acid: Headache disorder
    3. One-Sentence Summary
    4. Quick Overview
    5. Why is This Prediction Reasonable?
    6. Clinical Trial Evidence
    7. Literature Evidence
    8. Australia Market Information
    9. Safety Considerations
    10. Conclusion and Next Steps
    11. Disclaimer

Pharmacist Assessment Report

Mefenamic Acid: Headache disorder

One-Sentence Summary

Mefenamic acid is an oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) that blocks prostaglandin synthesis. The TxGNN model predicts it may be useful for headache disorder. No clinical trials are registered for this indication, but 19 publications were compiled, including several small, older randomised double-blind studies in migraine.

Quick Overview

Item Content
Original Indication Not recorded in the local data
Predicted New Indication Headache disorder
TxGNN Prediction Score 0.9964
Evidence Level L2
Australia Market Status Listed on the PBS Schedule (1 of 1 items) – TGA (ARTG) registration status is not included in this data
Number of PBS Items 1 (valid: 1)
Recommended Decision Proceed with Guardrails

Why is This Prediction Reasonable?

Detailed mechanism-of-action data are not available in the data compiled for this report. Mefenamic acid is an NSAID that inhibits cyclooxygenase (COX) and so reduces prostaglandin synthesis.

Prostaglandins are implicated in headache and migraine pain. They are particularly implicated in menstrual migraine, where prostaglandin release is thought to be a driver. This gives a plausible mechanistic link between COX inhibition and headache relief.

The published randomised comparisons are small and mostly decades old. They cover acute migraine treatment against paracetamol, migraine prevention against propranolol and placebo, and menstrual migraine against placebo. They support the idea but do not settle it.

Clinical Trial Evidence

Currently no related clinical trials registered.

Literature Evidence

PMID Year Type Journal Key Findings
6347393 1983 RCT (double-blind crossover) Cephalalgia Mefenamic acid 500 mg compared with paracetamol 500 mg in 40 migraine patients over six attacks, with metoclopramide given in all attacks
3524092 1986 RCT (double-blind crossover) Acta Neurol Scand In 17 completers, mefenamic acid and propranolol both significantly reduced attack frequency and total duration versus placebo; no significant effect on average severity or duration
10799353 2000 RCT (double-blind, placebo) Eur J Med Res 24 women with menstrual migraine without aura were treated over two cycles, comparing mefenamic acid with placebo
22529203 2012 Guideline Neurology AAN/AHS evidence-based update on NSAIDs and other complementary treatments for episodic migraine prevention in adults
18427072 2008 Evidence-based review Neurology Systematic review and meta-analysis of therapy trials for acute and short-term preventive treatment of menstrually related migraine
20836574 2010 Review Drugs Prevention and treatment of menstrual migraine
8749241 1995 Review Cephalalgia Analgesics and NSAIDs for the acute migraine attack, usually with an antiemetic
1495823 1992 Review Pathol Biol Review of controlled NSAID studies in migraine attacks and prophylaxis, including mefenamic acid
40265504 2025 Review Curr Opin Neurol Update on the clinical course and management of migraine in women
29095288 2017 Case series and review (safety) Medicine Severe enteropathy with villous atrophy reported in prolonged mefenamic acid users

Australia Market Information

ARTG Number Product Name Dosage Form Approved Indication
ARTG 1824B FEMIN Capsule 250 mg (oral) Not available in the data compiled for this report

Safety Considerations

  • Drug Interactions: The data compiled for this report list 100 recorded interactions. Examples:
    • Moderate: corticosteroids (hydrocortisone, dexamethasone, betamethasone, triamcinolone, budesonide), metformin, acetylsalicylic acid, mesalazine, balsalazide, aprepitant, chlorpropamide, potassium citrate and potassium bicarbonate.
    • Minor: famotidine, ranitidine, cimetidine and dapagliflozin.
  • Literature-based safety signals:
    • Severe enteropathy with villous atrophy has been reported with prolonged use.
    • Analgesic-associated renal disease was documented in patients with chronic headache, with mefenamic acid among the commonly used agents.
    • NSAID overuse is linked to medication-overuse headache, which is relevant to any long-term headache use.

Please refer to the TGA-approved Product Information (PI) for full warnings and contraindications.

Conclusion and Next Steps

Decision: Proceed with Guardrails

Rationale: Several randomised double-blind studies in migraine, a major headache disorder, support a benefit. They are small and dated, however, and no registered trials or Phase 3 data exist. Safety concerns with prolonged use (enteropathy, renal effects, medication-overuse headache) call for restricted, short-term use and close monitoring.

To proceed, the following is needed:

  • Review of the TGA Product Information for warnings and contraindications
  • Confirmation of mechanism-of-action data
  • A modern, adequately powered randomised trial in a defined headache population, such as menstrual migraine
  • A plan to limit treatment duration and to monitor gastrointestinal, renal and cardiovascular risk and medication-overuse headache

Disclaimer

This content is for research purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical validation is required before any clinical application.



This site uses Just the Docs, a documentation theme for Jekyll.