Rifampicin

Evidence Level: L4 Predicted Indications: 10

Table of Contents

  1. Rifampicin
    1. Pharmacist Assessment Report
    2. Rifampicin: From Pulmonary Tuberculosis to Conjunctivitis
    3. One-Sentence Summary
    4. Quick Overview
    5. Why is This Prediction Reasonable?
    6. Clinical Trial Evidence
    7. Literature Evidence
    8. Australia Market Information
    9. Cytotoxicity
    10. Safety Considerations
    11. Conclusion and Next Steps
      1. Other predicted indications (for reference)
    12. Disclaimer

Pharmacist Assessment Report

Rifampicin: From Pulmonary Tuberculosis to Conjunctivitis

One-Sentence Summary

Rifampicin is a broad-spectrum antibiotic originally used to treat pulmonary tuberculosis. The TxGNN model predicts it may be effective for conjunctivitis, but there are no registered clinical trials and only indirect literature (mainly older topical trachoma and chlamydial eye studies and susceptibility surveys) supporting this direction.

Quick Overview

Item Content
Original Indication Pulmonary tuberculosis
Predicted New Indication Conjunctivitis
TxGNN Prediction Score 0.9995
Evidence Level L4
Australia Market Status Listed on the PBS Schedule (1 of 1 items) – TGA (ARTG) registration status is not included in this data
Number of PBS Items 1 (valid: 1)
Recommended Decision Hold

Why is This Prediction Reasonable?

Currently, detailed mechanism of action data is not available in the data compiled for this report. Based on known information, rifampicin is a broad-spectrum antibacterial that inhibits bacterial RNA polymerase. It has activity against Gram-positive bacteria, Staphylococcus and Chlamydia, and its efficacy in tuberculosis is established.

Bacterial conjunctivitis is commonly caused by Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Haemophilus and Chlamydia trachomatis. An antibacterial with activity against these organisms could plausibly be applied. The evidence is indirect, however: older studies used topical (eye ointment) rifampicin, whereas the only Australian product is an oral capsule. A topical ocular formulation and antimicrobial resistance (tuberculosis stewardship) concerns remain unresolved.

Note that the model also returned a near-duplicate entry, “conjunctivitis (disease)” (score 0.9960), which should be merged with this one. Their literature largely overlaps.

Clinical Trial Evidence

Currently no related clinical trials registered for conjunctivitis.

Literature Evidence

PMID Year Type Journal Key Findings
1096630 1975 Controlled clinical study Am J Ophthalmol 1% rifampicin or 1% tetracycline ointment vs boric acid ointment in endemic trachoma in Tunisian schoolchildren (10 weeks’ treatment)
322700 1977 Open trial Br J Ophthalmol 1% rifampicin eye ointment vs chloramphenicol in 63 patients with chlamydial eye infection; 3 weeks was insufficient, 6-7 weeks gave about 90% clinical and microbiological cure
33457332 2020 Cross-sectional Adv Biomed Res Bacterial causes and antibiotic susceptibility of conjunctivitis isolates in Kashan, Iran
21191558 2010 In vitro study Rev Esp Quimioter Antibiotic susceptibility of Corynebacterium macginleyi strains causing conjunctivitis
30347565 2018 Susceptibility study Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi Genetic typing and susceptibility of S. aureus from keratitis or conjunctivitis
8363150 1993 Microbiology study An Esp Pediatr Organisms and antibiotic sensitivity in 50 neonatal conjunctivitis samples
3191080 1988 Case series Br J Ophthalmol Marginal corneal abscesses in adult chlamydial ophthalmia
39336466 2024 Case report Medicina (Kaunas) Parinaud oculoglandular syndrome with Bartonella DNA detected in cornea and conjunctiva
1247775 1976 Report BMJ Ocular toxicity due to rifampicin (a safety signal)
5005929 1971 Review Ann Ophthalmol General review of rifampicin

Australia Market Information

ARTG Number Product Name Dosage Form Approved Indication
ARTG 12189M Rimycin 300 Capsule 300 mg (oral) Not available in the data compiled for this report

Cytotoxicity

Rifampicin is an antibacterial, not an antineoplastic, so this section does not apply.

Safety Considerations

  • Contraindications suggested by the knowledge graph (these are drug-disease associations, not product label text): liver failure, acute liver failure, hepatitis and other liver disease; porphyria; gallbladder disease; blood disorders (thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, agranulocytosis, anaemia, pancytopenia, aplastic anaemia); diabetes mellitus and diabetic ketoacidosis; gout; peripheral neuropathy; substance abuse/dependence; slow acetylator status; non-infectious meningitis; anxiety and related disorders.
  • Drug Interactions: The interaction screen returned 100 interactions, and the 20 listed were all rated Moderate. These include rabeprazole, omeprazole, doxycycline, clarithromycin, metronidazole, metformin, pioglitazone, canagliflozin, chlorpropamide, bupropion, aprepitant, morphine, and several corticosteroids (hydrocortisone, dexamethasone, betamethasone, triamcinolone) and vitamin D analogues (cholecalciferol, calcifediol, calcitriol). Rifampicin is a strong enzyme inducer, so co-medications need review.
  • Ocular safety: Early reports describe ocular toxicity associated with rifampicin (PMIDs 1247775 and 1260294).

Please also refer to the TGA-approved Product Information (PI) for full warnings and contraindications.

Conclusion and Next Steps

Decision: Hold

Rationale: Support for conjunctivitis rests on a high model score, in vitro susceptibility data and a few 1970s topical-ointment studies, with no registered trials. The only Australian product is an oral capsule, and there are antimicrobial stewardship concerns.

To proceed, the following is needed:

  • Product Information warnings and contraindications for the Australian product
  • Mechanism of action data
  • A topical ocular formulation, or a justification for the oral route
  • Modern controlled trials against current standard-of-care eye antibiotics
  • A stewardship assessment on resistance risk for tuberculosis treatment
  • Merging of the duplicate “conjunctivitis” entries

Other predicted indications (for reference)

Rank Predicted Indication Score Evidence Level Comment Decision
2 Multiple endocrine neoplasia 0.9986 L5 Prediction only Hold
3 Acne (disease) 0.9974 L4 Evidence mostly concerns hidradenitis suppurativa (clindamycin + rifampicin), not acne vulgaris Hold
5 HIV infectious disease 0.9959 L4 Phase 2/3 trials are TB/HIV co-infection and interaction studies, not anti-HIV efficacy Research Question
7 Rheumatoid arthritis 0.9945 L3 Small 1980s-90s studies with limited, inconsistent benefit; one Phase 1 PK trial Research Question

Disclaimer

This content is for research purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical validation is required before any clinical application.



This site uses Just the Docs, a documentation theme for Jekyll.