Sofosbuvir
| Evidence Level: L3 | Predicted Indications: 8 |
Table of Contents
Sofosbuvir: From Chronic Hepatitis C to Hepatitis B Virus Infection
One-Sentence Summary
Sofosbuvir is a nucleotide polymerase inhibitor, originally used to treat chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. The TxGNN model predicts it may be effective for hepatitis B virus infection, but the supporting data come almost entirely from HCV/HBV co-infection studies. Only 1 small Phase 2 study (n=21) has looked at HBV directly, and there is no clear mechanistic basis for antiviral activity against HBV.
Quick Overview
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Original Indication | Chronic hepatitis C virus infection (approved indication text not available in the data compiled) |
| Predicted New Indication | Hepatitis B virus infection |
| TxGNN Prediction Score | 0.9977 |
| Evidence Level | L3 |
| Australia Market Status | Listed on the PBS Schedule (2 of 2 items) – TGA (ARTG) registration status is not included in this data |
| Number of PBS Items | 2 (valid: 2) |
| Recommended Decision | Hold |
Why is This Prediction Reasonable?
Detailed mechanism of action data for sofosbuvir are not available in the data compiled for this report. From what is known, sofosbuvir is a nucleotide analogue that inhibits the HCV NS5B RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. It is marketed in Australia as part of fixed-dose combinations with velpatasvir (Epclusa) and with velpatasvir plus voxilaprevir (Vosevi).
The mechanistic link to HBV is weak. HBV is a DNA virus that replicates through a reverse-transcriptase step, so sofosbuvir has no established direct activity against it. The clinical data come from HCV/HBV co-infection, where clearing HCV can shift HBV-DNA and HBsAg levels. The main safety concern in that setting is HBV reactivation, and the evidence supports monitoring or prophylaxis (for example with tenofovir alafenamide) rather than using sofosbuvir to treat HBV. The score comes from the TxGNN model (deep learning) and may reflect similarities the model learned between related diseases, not biological evidence or a proven treatment effect.
The single most relevant study is a Phase 2 open-label trial of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir in HBV mono-infection, which was based on a modest HBsAg reduction seen retrospectively in co-infected patients.
Clinical Trial Evidence
| Trial Number | Phase | Status | Enrolment | Key Findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCT03312023 | Phase 2 | Completed | 21 | Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir for 12 weeks in HBV-infected subjects; single-arm and small, so it can only show HBV behaviour and safety, not efficacy |
| NCT02555943 | Phase 2/3 | Completed | 23 | DAAs in HCV/HBV co-infection; focus on HBV reactivation during anti-HCV treatment |
| NCT04997564 | Phase 4 | Unknown | 120 | SOF/VEL with prophylactic TAF in HCV/HBV co-infection; tests prevention of HBV reactivation |
| NCT03186313 | Phase 3 | Completed | 72 | Randomised sofosbuvir-based combinations in genotype 4 HCV; efficacy target is HCV |
| NCT02483156 | Phase 2/3 | Completed | 80 | Sofosbuvir plus ribavirin in genotype 4 HCV; HBV link is through the study population |
| NCT03549312 | Phase 4 | Unknown | 25 | HIV/HCV switch feasibility study; HBV relevance is incidental |
No ANZCTR identifiers were available in the data compiled.
Literature Evidence
| PMID | Year | Type | Journal | Key Findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 36045503 | 2023 | Phase 2 open-label trial | J Med Virol | Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir in HBV mono-infection, with HBsAg and HBV DNA decline as endpoints |
| 42558970 | 2026 | Clinical study | J Clin Transl Hepatol | Safety and efficacy of SOF/VEL with TAF pre-treatment in HBV/HCV co-infection, assessing HBV reactivation |
| 35268497 | 2022 | Cohort | J Clin Med | Different HBV-DNA and HBsAg kinetics in HCV co-infected patients during DAA therapy |
| 33523503 | 2021 | Prospective observational | J Viral Hepat | HBV reactivation in cancer patients receiving DAAs for HCV |
| 26967675 | 2016 | Review | J Clin Virol | HBV reactivation as a challenge during DAA treatment of HCV |
| 31542053 | 2019 | Case report | J Med Case Rep | HBV reactivation with an immune-escape mutant during sofosbuvir/velpatasvir treatment |
| 27621502 | 2015 | Case report | Hosp Pharm | HBV reactivation with simeprevir plus sofosbuvir |
| 25027705 | 2014 | Review | Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol | Antivirals for hepatitis B and C and their effects on kidney function |
Australia Market Information
| ARTG Number | Product Name | Dosage Form | Approved Indication |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARTG 11144M | Epclusa | Tablet containing 400 mg sofosbuvir with 100 mg velpatasvir | Not available in the data compiled |
| ARTG 11658N | Vosevi | Tablet containing 400 mg sofosbuvir with 100 mg velpatasvir and 100 mg voxilaprevir | Not available in the data compiled |
Safety Considerations
- Drug Interactions (8 interactions recorded):
- Major: apalutamide, enzalutamide, lorlatinib
- Moderate: fostamatinib, warfarin, dicoumarol, encorafenib
- Minor: cyclosporine
- HBV reactivation: The literature in this report repeatedly shows that HBV can reactivate when HCV is cleared with direct-acting antivirals in co-infected patients. This is directly relevant to any HBV-related use.
For other warnings and contraindications, please refer to the TGA-approved Product Information (PI).
Conclusion and Next Steps
Decision: Hold
Rationale: There is no mechanistic basis for direct anti-HBV activity, and the clinical evidence is limited to HCV/HBV co-infection plus one small, single-arm Phase 2 study. The data point towards HBV reactivation risk and monitoring rather than treatment benefit.
To proceed, the following is needed:
- Mechanism of action data and any in vitro evidence of anti-HBV activity
- Controlled studies of HBV efficacy in HBV mono-infection, with virological endpoints (HBsAg, HBV DNA)
- Approved indication text and PI safety information (warnings, contraindications) for the Australian products
- A monitoring or prophylaxis plan for HBV reactivation in co-infected patients
Disclaimer
This content is for research purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical validation is required before any clinical application.