Ustekinumab

Evidence Level: L2 Predicted Indications: 10

Table of Contents

  1. Ustekinumab
    1. Pharmacist Assessment Report
    2. Ustekinumab: Dermatitis
    3. One-Sentence Summary
    4. Quick Overview
    5. Why is This Prediction Reasonable?
    6. Clinical Trial Evidence
    7. Literature Evidence
    8. Australia Market Information
    9. Safety Considerations
    10. Conclusion and Next Steps
    11. Disclaimer

Pharmacist Assessment Report

Ustekinumab: Dermatitis

One-Sentence Summary

Ustekinumab is an IL-12/IL-23 antagonist, originally used to treat psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis and related conditions. The TxGNN model predicts it may be effective for dermatitis (in the available evidence, mainly atopic dermatitis), with 6 clinical trials (2 directly testing ustekinumab in atopic dermatitis) and 20 publications identified. However, the clinical results to date have been modest and inconsistent.

Quick Overview

Item Content
Original Indication Not recorded in the local data
Predicted New Indication Dermatitis
TxGNN Prediction Score 0.9999
Evidence Level L2
Australia Market Status Listed on the PBS Schedule (1 of 1 items) – TGA (ARTG) registration status is not included in this data
Number of PBS Items 1 (valid: 1)
Recommended Decision Hold

Why is This Prediction Reasonable?

Detailed mechanism of action data is not available in the data compiled for this report. Based on known information, ustekinumab blocks the p40 subunit shared by IL-12 and IL-23, which inhibits the Th1 and Th17 pathways. This is well established in psoriasis.

Psoriasis and dermatitis are both chronic inflammatory skin diseases. However, atopic dermatitis is mainly driven by Th2 immunity, with variable Th1/Th17 contributions (for example in chronic, intrinsic, paediatric or Asian-phenotype disease). The mechanistic rationale is therefore plausible but only partial.

Clinical results in atopic dermatitis have been modest and inconsistent. Th2-targeted agents such as dupilumab and tralokinumab are clearly more effective.

Clinical Trial Evidence

Trial Number Phase Status Enrolment Key Findings
NCT01945086 Phase 2 Completed 79 Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of two ustekinumab doses in Japanese adults with severe atopic dermatitis
NCT01806662 Phase 2 Completed 32 Randomised pilot of ustekinumab in chronic atopic dermatitis with sub-optimal response to prior therapy
NCT05535738 Phase 2/3 Active, not recruiting 45 Contact dermatitis model using biologics to study skin inflammation via suction blistering (mechanistic study)
NCT02074982 Phase 3 Completed 676 CLEAR: secukinumab vs ustekinumab in plaque psoriasis (existing indication, not dermatitis)
NCT01356758 N/A Completed 126 Cardiovascular risk assessment in severe psoriasis patients on biologics (not dermatitis efficacy)
NCT07352566 Phase 4 Not yet recruiting 10 Microdevice for testing drugs in situ on atopic dermatitis and psoriasis skin (no efficacy data)

Literature Evidence

PMID Year Type Journal Key Findings
27304428 2017 RCT Exp Dermatol Phase 2 placebo-controlled study of ustekinumab in 33 adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis
28338223 2017 RCT Br J Dermatol Phase 2 placebo-controlled study of ustekinumab in Japanese patients with severe atopic dermatitis
29164954 2018 Systematic review J Dermatolog Treat Evaluates efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in atopic dermatitis
32927498 2020 Network meta-analysis Cochrane Database Syst Rev Compares systemic treatments for eczema
33074565 2021 Systematic review/meta-analysis Allergy Evidence appraisal of systemic treatments for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (for the EAACI guideline)
29098604 2018 Systematic review/meta-analysis Am J Clin Dermatol Asks whether biologics are efficacious in atopic dermatitis
33849369 2022 Real-world evidence J Dermatolog Treat Real-world analysis of ustekinumab in atopic dermatitis; anecdotal reports show conflicting results
36208443 2022 Review Dermatol Ther Review of off-label uses of ustekinumab
32172523 2020 Review Clin Drug Investig Reviews atopic dermatitis therapies that failed clinical trials
32347968 2020 Review Contact Dermatitis Reviews biologics in allergic contact dermatitis

Australia Market Information

ARTG Number Product Name Dosage Form Approved Indication
10767Q Stelara Injection 45 mg in 0.5 mL Not listed in the data compiled for this report

Safety Considerations

  • Drug Interactions: 100 interactions were identified. The ones listed here are mostly moderate:
    • Corticosteroids (hydrocortisone, triamcinolone, dexamethasone, betamethasone, budesonide, prednisone, prednisolone): Moderate
    • Anticoagulants (warfarin, apixaban, rivaroxaban, dicoumarol): Moderate
    • Simvastatin: Moderate
    • Radiopharmaceuticals and radioimmunotherapies (iobenguane I-131, ibritumomab tiuxetan, tositumomab, tositumomab I-131): Moderate
    • Zinc salts (sulfate, acetate, gluconate, chloride): Minor

Please refer to the TGA-approved Product Information (PI) for warnings and contraindications.

Conclusion and Next Steps

Decision: Hold

Rationale: Two Phase 2 randomised trials and several systematic reviews have tested ustekinumab in atopic dermatitis, but the results have been modest and inconsistent. The mechanistic fit is only partial, and Th2-targeted agents are clearly more effective. This is better treated as a research question than a repurposing candidate for now. The other nine predictions (for example neonatal dermatomyositis, pityriasis lichenoides) have no supporting trials or literature.

To proceed, the following is needed:

  • A critical appraisal of the Phase 2 results (NCT01945086, NCT01806662 and PMIDs 27304428, 28338223) to confirm the magnitude of effect
  • Evidence for a defined subgroup (for example chronic, intrinsic, paediatric or Asian-phenotype disease) where Th1/Th17 activity predominates
  • Mechanism of action data and TGA Product Information safety details (warnings and contraindications)
  • Comparison with approved Th2-targeted therapies in the Australian context

    Disclaimer

This content is for research purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical validation is required before any clinical application.



This site uses Just the Docs, a documentation theme for Jekyll.